Argumentree is an argument-native deliberation platform for DAO governance. It supports Ethereum and EVM Layer-2s (Arbitrum, Optimism, Base, Polygon) via MetaMask, Cardano via Eternl/Lace/SecondFi with live Conway transaction building, and Polkadot & Kusama via Polkadot.js/Talisman/SubWallet/Nova. Every proposal becomes a hierarchical pro/con argument tree with ratings, AI argument-checks, Q&A, Compromise and Review — a companion to Snapshot, Tally, GovTool and Polkassembly.
DAOs vote on-chain, but they decide in Discord, Telegram and forum threads — fast, flat and forgotten. Argumentree turns that scattered debate into a structured argument tree, so the reasoning behind every proposal is visible, rated and permanent.
Ethereum • Arbitrum • Cardano • Polkadot & Kusama
Watch how a proposal becomes a structured pro/con argument tree — with Q&A, compromise and a permanent record of the reasoning.
Each ecosystem governs differently. Pick yours for the mechanics, the DAOs, and exactly what Argumentree does there.
The largest DAO ecosystem — Uniswap, Aave, ENS, Optimism, Arbitrum and more, across mainnet and L2s.
One of the most active L2 DAOs — a multi-billion-ARB treasury, AIPs and a paid delegate class.
Conway-era on-chain governance — DReps, the Constitutional Committee and live on-chain voting.
OpenGov referenda on Polkadot & Kusama — conviction voting and per-track delegation.
MetaMask across Ethereum + L2s, Eternl/Lace/SecondFi on Cardano, and Polkadot.js/Talisman/SubWallet/Nova on Polkadot & Kusama.
The tree, ratings, AI checks, Q&A, Compromise and Review work identically on every chain — the product is chain-agnostic.
Question authors directly, turn rejected proposals into workable compromises, and feed argument-level evaluations into 15+ frameworks — on every chain.
Across every chain the pattern is the same: the vote is on-chain, but the debate that decides it is scattered across chat and forums with no structure, no ratings and no memory.
Telegram, Discord and forum threads have no tools to organize arguments logically. Complex proposals become convoluted threads no one can follow.
There is no way to see the arguments for and against a proposal at a glance — the reasoning is buried across hundreds of messages.
Multiple groups debate the same topic in parallel, scattering the discussion into siloed, inefficient and untransparent conversations.
The fast pace of chat deters thoughtful responses. High message volume with no structure overwhelms newcomers and veterans alike — a real barrier to participation.
Groups attract like-minded members, limiting diversity of thought, while conversations wander off-topic and rarely resolve.
Without structured argument and source verification, false claims spread and go unchallenged in the noise.
Finding an old decision or the reasoning behind a past vote is cumbersome to impossible. The 'why' is lost the moment the thread scrolls away.
The lack of transparency in voters' opinions and reasoning drives disengagement — and the cost of bad decisions to a DAO treasury is high.
Argumentree replaces the flat thread with a structured argument tree — the reasoning behind every proposal, visible, rated and permanent. Not another voting tool: the layer that makes voting informed.
Every proposal is the root node; pro and con arguments branch beneath it and recurse into sub-arguments. The full logical structure of a debate is visible at a glance — not a flat thread.
Arguments are rated by validity and impact on their parent, so the strongest points rise to the top of each pro/con list. The community weighs reasoning, not just volume.
On submission each argument is checked for duplication (over 90% similarity), toxicity, logical relation to its parent, and correct pro/con placement — keeping the tree clean and on-topic.
Voters ask proposal and argument authors direct questions; the most important questions get up-rated. Deliberation becomes a cooperative learning environment, not a shouting match.
Rejected proposals collect every argument against them so authors can adjust and resubmit (for example a 12-month, 1M ask becomes a phased 6-month, 500k plan). Guided Compromise digitally integrates Harvard Negotiation Project, Walton & McKersie, and Thomas-Kilmann methods.
Argument-level evaluations feed 15+ industry-standard frameworks — Post-Mortem, Post-Implementation Review, Variance Report, Earned Value Management and more — each deepened by community insight.
An argument-ranking dashboard and a timeline slider of the tree show how consensus evolved — where a debate shifted from pro to con, which arguments surged, how opinion moved after key events.
The UI follows each member's language and new arguments are auto-translated into 10+ languages, so a global DAO deliberates together instead of splitting into language silos.
Compliance isn't only about the vote — it's about being able to show how and why a decision was made. That 'how and why' is the discussion. An ephemeral Discord or Telegram thread can't be produced for an auditor or a court; a timestamped, permanent argument tree can. Argumentree turns a DAO's deliberation into a durable, defensible governance record — which is exactly where blockchain governance and regulation now meet.
MiCA (Regulation (EU) 2023/1114) Article 68 sets governance and record-keeping obligations for crypto-asset service providers, and its delegated rules specify the records of activities and decisions that must be kept. ESMA has signalled it will look through DAO structures to economic reality — so many DAOs face CASP-style obligations. Structured, timestamped argument trees plus on-chain vote records form the durable decision record those obligations expect.
European DAO members are data subjects, but on-chain data is immutable — in tension with the GDPR right to erasure (Article 17). Argumentree keeps personal and discussion data off-chain in EU-hosted storage where it can be deleted, treating on-chain data as read-only reference. Your deliberation layer is compliant where the chain itself cannot be.
Wyoming DAO LLCs, Marshall Islands foundations and similar legal wrappers need evidence of genuine deliberation for legal standing and member liability protection. A hierarchical, searchable record of the arguments behind each decision is exactly that evidence — impossible to reconstruct from a scrolled-away chat.
Sources: MiCA practical guide — Norton Rose Fulbright · MiCA CASP compliance 2026
Explore a real blockchain governance tenant — connect a wallet and see structured discussion in action.
Argumentree is an argument-native deliberation layer for DAOs. Instead of a flat Discord or forum thread, every proposal becomes a hierarchical tree of pro and con arguments — rated, AI-checked and permanent — so token holders can see the reasoning behind a decision, not just the vote. It complements your voting tools (Snapshot, Tally, GovTool, Polkassembly), it doesn't replace them.
Ethereum and EVM Layer-2s (Arbitrum, Optimism, Base, Polygon) via MetaMask; Cardano via Eternl, Lace and SecondFi with live Conway transaction building; and Polkadot & Kusama via Polkadot.js, Talisman, SubWallet and Nova. Each chain has its own dedicated page with the specifics.
No — it's a companion. Those tools handle the mechanics of the vote (off-chain signaling, on-chain execution, referendum listing). Argumentree structures the argument that decides how people vote: hierarchical pro/con trees with ratings, source-backed claims and a permanent, searchable record.
On Polkadot and Kusama, Argumentree can score connected wallets on Substrate-native signals (on-chain identity, staking, wallet age and activity) to filter sockpuppets. Across every chain, structured argument trees with ratings surface the strongest reasoning over raw message volume.
Q&A lets voters question proposal authors directly; Compromise (with Guided Compromise built on Harvard Negotiation, Walton & McKersie and Thomas-Kilmann methods) helps rejected proposals collect every counter-argument and be re-submitted; Review feeds argument-level evaluations into 15+ professional frameworks; and an analytics timeline shows how consensus evolved.
Related: DAO governance use case · what is DAO governance · governance & compliance
Connect a wallet on any supported chain and document the reasoning behind every decision.